Face Rating Test

A face rating test uses AI facial landmark detection to measure specific geometric properties of your face — like symmetry and proportion — against established aesthetic reference ranges, then combines them into a single rating, typically shown on a 1-10 scale.

The Attractiveness Test (/attractiveness-test) scores five facial proportion ratios — eye spacing, nose breadth, mouth width, face ratio, and facial thirds — on a 0-100 scale. This Face Rating Test uses a different set of five signals — symmetry, golden-ratio proximity, canthal tilt, jaw definition, and eye harmony — and presents the result as a single 1-10 rating with an estimated percentile. They measure different things and will often give different results for the same photo.

No. This is an illustrative, entertainment-focused tool. It measures real geometric properties of your face using real landmark detection, but the "ideal" reference ranges (golden ratio, canthal tilt range, etc.) are drawn from popular aesthetic literature, not a rigorous scientific consensus on attractiveness — which does not exist. The percentile is modeled against an assumed population curve, not real survey data.

No. All processing happens entirely in your browser using Google's MediaPipe Face Landmarker. Your photo never leaves your device and is not uploaded to any server.

Canthal tilt is the angle of the line running from the inner corner of your eye to the outer corner. A positive (upturned) tilt, often cited as +2° to +8°, is frequently referenced in beauty and cosmetic surgery discussions as aesthetically favored — though preferences vary widely across cultures and individuals.

The golden ratio (phi, approximately 1.618) is a mathematical proportion that recurs in classical art and architecture. Some facial-aesthetics frameworks claim that facial proportions closer to phi — like face height to width — are perceived as more harmonious, though this claim is debated in the scientific literature.

The two tools measure genuinely different geometric signals using different reference ranges and different math, so a different result is expected and normal. Think of them as two different opinions, not two measurements of the same thing.

Yes, significantly. Head angle, expression, lighting, camera distance, and even image compression can all shift the detected landmark positions and therefore every signal in this test. For a consistent result, use a similar front-facing, neutral-expression photo each time.

The percentile is an illustrative estimate of how your overall 0-100 score compares to a modeled population curve (assumed to be roughly centered around 62, with typical variation). It is not based on real survey data of other users' scores — treat it as a fun indicator, not a statistic.

The landmark detection itself works across face shapes and ethnicities. However, the "ideal" reference ranges used for scoring (golden ratio, canthal tilt, etc.) originate mostly from Western aesthetic traditions and may not reflect the full diversity of features and beauty standards worldwide — keep that context in mind when reading your result.

This tool covers the same general idea as what online communities call a "PSL score test" — rating facial attractiveness from a photo on a numeric scale — but it is not affiliated with any specific forum or rating system, and it does not use PSL's informal scoring conventions. It is a free, automated, geometry-based rating (symmetry, golden ratio, canthal tilt, jaw definition, and eye harmony) presented on a simple 1-10 scale, for entertainment purposes only.